Six reasons classified programs keep choosing Rocket.Chat

Unified communications, deployable anywhere
Self-hosted, air-gapped, or sovereign cloud, entirely under your control
Pexip for secure video on your own Infinity server, at the same classification
No second boundary to accredit for video
One platform instead of a stack you assemble yourself
Zero Trust and
post-quantum
Access verified continuously, rather than once at login
Decision-level audit logs: user, channel, attributes, decision, timestamp
Fail-secure by default, so a user without the required attributes cannot be added or stay
Aligned to NIST SP 800-207, SP 800-162, and CNSA 2.0


Protocol driven and agnostic
Native homeservers for both protocols, server to server, with nothing in between to accredit
Identity and attribution preserved end to end, so every message ties to a real person
Bridges reach proprietary platforms like Microsoft Teams, and others such as IRC
One accreditation scope, however many protocols you speak
Resilient at the tactical edge
Operates under DDIL conditions, from headquarters to the tactical edge
Integrated with mission systems including TAK Server and ATAK
Runs on government-issued and personal devices under your access policy
Extend it through the REST API, SDKs, and Apps Engine


Continuity of operations
Self-hosted or air-gapped deployment, with updates and patches that arrive offline
Redundant high-availability architecture
Secure fallback channels through an outage, cyberattack, or crisis
Runs without calling home to stay licensed
See why mission-critical organizations
choose Secure CommsOS®
funded by the U.S. DHS
Have questions?
Here's what we often hear
Teams stays the enterprise standard where it works. Rocket.Chat bridges Teams messages in and covers the places Teams cannot go: air-gapped, classified, and DDIL environments. You keep the Microsoft investment, and sensitive work stays governed.
No. We run native XMPP and Matrix homeservers, so a partner on either protocol connects to you directly, with identity and attribution intact. Nobody deploys a bridge, and nobody accredits a second server.
Attribute-based access is what the mandate asks for. Access is evaluated request by request against your IdP, and every decision is logged with user, attributes, and timestamp, which is what an assessor needs to see. Aligned to NIST SP 800-207 and SP 800-162.
Yes. On your own hardware, air-gapped, or in a sovereign cloud. The source is open, so your security team can review it or bring in a third party.
Pricing depends on deployment model and scale, so we quote it rather than list it. See the plans and what's included in each here.




.png)

.avif)


.png)
